windolove 's blog

Windolove'blog.Write about internet,Business and everything I love it.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Older Brothers and GAY.

The number of biological older brothers a boy's mother has carried--whether they live with him in the same household or not--affects his chances of being gay. The findings, reported this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, by Anthony Bogaert of Brock University, lend credence to the theory that it's not the social or rearing factors that influence a man's sexual orientation, but rather prenatal mechanisms that begin in the womb.

The idea that prenatal mechanisms may influence sexual orientation has been around for a couple of decades. In 1996, Bogaert along with colleague Ray Blanchard correlated sexual orientation in men with the number of older brothers, but it wasn't clear if that influence was occurring because the boys shared the same household or because they had shared the same womb.

In the new study, Bogaert pitted prenatal against postnatal by examining four samples of homosexual and heterosexual men, for a total of 944 participants. The data for three of the samples had been collected previously, and included detailed information about the men's sexual orientation, as well as their family life. Because most of the men from these three study groups came from unbroken families, Bogaert looked at a fourth group, composed of men who had been adopted or raised with half- or step-siblings. He also gathered data from this group about how long members lived with each sibling and whether they had brothers or sisters with whom they had never lived.

He reasoned that if the social or rearing factor theories were correct, he would expect to see certain things. First, it wouldn't matter whether a gay man's older brothers had been biologically related or not, the social influence would be there. Second, the amount of time the young boy lived with his older brothers, biological or not, should affect his sexual orientation. Third, if the boy did not live with older brothers, then the numbers should not impact his sexual preference.

Bogaert found the opposite to be true. First, he found that only the number of biological older brothers predicted sexual orientation in men--even when the number of non-biological older brothers was significantly higher. Second, his study showed that the amount of time reared with older brothers--either related or not--did not predict a young boy's becoming homosexual. And surprisingly, Bogaert discovered that even if a young man did not grow up in the same house as his older brothers, the fact that he had older biological brothers increased his odds of being gay.

The fact that the common denominator between the older and younger biological brothers is the mother hints at a prenatal influence on sexual orientation. What it could be is still a mystery. But one theory suggests that after delivering a boy, a woman's immune system produces antibodies to male-specific proteins. During subsequent pregnancies the mother's placenta may deliver the antibodies to the fetus, possibly affecting its development.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Before you start,tell you about debt!

The average college senior graduated this year with more than $19,000 in debt. That's a problem Joe Palazzolo would love to have.
Palazzolo, 25, graduated on Mother's Day from Rutgers University with a master's degree in public policy and student loans exceeding $116,000. His payments will average about $800 a month. It could have been worse: Because of his top grades, Rutgers paid Palazzolo's tuition for his final year of graduate school.

At a time when his friends are thinking about buying their first homes, he's looking for roommates to share a three-bedroom house so he can limit his rent to $600 a month. "I feel like I've done everything I was supposed to do, and at the end of the day, I've got this huge debt," Palazzolo says. "What did I do wrong?"

After years of rising college costs and shrinking financial aid, it's come to this: Some graduates are now leaving college with student-loan debt in the six figures.

Graduates with more than $100,000 in debt still account for a small subset of borrowers. But their numbers are rising. And the proportion who are leaving college with some level of unmanageable debt — debt they can't repay without significant hardship — is swelling.

In 2004, nearly 8% of graduating seniors carried student loans of $40,000 or more, according to the Project on Student Debt, a non-profit advocacy group. In 1993, even adjusted for inflation, only 1.3% of college seniors had debt that large, says Robert Shireman, director of the project.

About 11% of graduates of private, non-profit colleges have loans of $40,000 or more vs. 5.5% for public colleges and universities, Shireman says.

The rise in unmanageable debt has raised concerns that many graduates won't be able to pursue careers in fields that have traditionally paid modest salaries. Nearly a quarter of four-year public-school graduates and 38% of private-school graduates who become teachers can't afford to repay their debts on a starting teacher's salary, a recent report by the Public Information Research Group's Higher Education Project found.

For social workers, the statistics were worse: 37% of public- and 55% of private-school graduates start their careers with unmanageable debt, PIRG says.

Take Emily Weinberg, 23, of Fairfax, Va. Weinberg graduated last year from Ithaca College in New York with a bachelor's degree in cinema and photography. Her student-loan debt exceeds $130,000.

When she was admitted to Ithaca, Weinberg says, she thought she'd qualify for a scholarship that would have covered most of her costs. She didn't get the scholarship. Yet, her parents' income and savings were too high for her to qualify for financial aid.

Her parents had saved more than $97,000 for her college education. But when the tech bubble burst in 2000, their college savings shrank to $23,000. With interest rates low, Weinberg borrowed.

Now, Weinberg, who works as a Web-content administrator in the Washington, D.C., area, devotes $1,200 of her $2,100 monthly take-home pay to her student loans. She lives with her boyfriend, who helps cover rent and other expenses. (Weinberg says she's required to pay only $791 a month toward her loans, but that would cover only the interest and would make her total balance expand even more.) Her dream of starting a photography studio remains just that — a dream. "This is not at all what I wanted to be," she says.

Sandy Baum, a policy analyst for the College Board, a membership group for colleges and universities, says there's always been a "small subset" of graduates with unmanageable debt, but they're not reflective of the typical borrower. Among the two-thirds of graduates with student loans, she says, the median sum (half are more and half are less) is $15,500 for public-school graduates and $19,400 for private-school graduates.

"It's very important to understand that most students graduate with no debt or a very manageable level of debt," Baum says. "That doesn't mean we shouldn't worry about" those students who are weighed down by much larger debt, she adds.

Inflating debt balances

Angela Schneider, 26, graduated last year from Simmons College in Boston with a master's degree in social work and $118,000 in student loans. To make her monthly payments of $800, Schneider has taken on a part-time job providing in-school therapy in addition to her full-time position as a medical social worker. She's living on a tight budget that allows her $70 a month for entertainment.

Working with people in deep financial trouble, Schneider says, helps put her own problems into perspective. "I don't need money for happiness," she says. Still, "It sure makes it easier."

Some graduates with unmanageable student loans acknowledge that their own actions and choices have contributed to the problem. Schneider says she has no regrets about her decision to attend Simmons College. Still, she adds, "I wish I had been a little more creative in finding financial help."

Weinberg says she didn't realize when she began borrowing that she could spend 30 years paying off her debt. At the same time, she says, "I signed the papers. It's my responsibility to get out of it."

Most student-loan payments are deferred until the borrower leaves school. That has the unfortunate effect of making it easy for students to ignore expanding balances. In many cases, students and their families don't understand the consequences of their choices until the bills come due, Shireman says. "Choosing a college and figuring out how to pay for it is a complicated and difficult endeavor," he says.

Other factors contributing to a rise in loan balances include:

•Shrinking federal aid.[B] College costs have risen by more than 50% since 1990, but federal aid hasn't kept up. Congress hasn't increased the Pell Grant, the most common form of direct aid for low-income students, since 2003. (The maximum Pell Grant is $4,050 a year.)

Both low- and middle-income families have been squeezed, Shireman says. "Grant aid has not kept pace with the increase in tuition and fees and other costs."

[B]•An increase in private loans. Federal Stafford loans let students borrow using federally backed loans with favorable interest rates and repayment terms. Unsubsidized Stafford loans are available to all students, even if they don't qualify for financial aid.

But there are limits to how much undergraduates can borrow. This year, the total in Stafford loans that a freshman can borrow is $2,625; for sophomores, the cutoff is $3,500. There are also limits on the amount of Stafford loans that graduate students can borrow. In 2004-05, private-loan borrowing rose by about 30%, according to the Project on Student Debt.

As a result, many students who attend private or out-of-state schools or pursue a graduate degree often must supplement their Stafford loans with more costly private loans. These loans lack some of the advantages of federally backed loans — such as provisions that let borrowers defer payments — and are costlier, Shireman says.

Starting July 1, new Stafford loans will carry a fixed rate of 6.8%, up from the current rate of 5.3% for loans in repayment. That's a big jump, but borrowers who consolidate their federal loans before July 1 can lock in the lower rate for the life of the loan.

That's not an option for most private-loan borrowers. Interest on those loans is variable and linked to market rates. The rates on Weinberg's private loans range from 7.5% to 8.2%. "I'm really scared of even another half-a-percent increase," she says.

•Pressure for advanced degrees. When Rachelle Routsong, 24, graduated from Brigham Young University with a bachelor's degree in health sciences, the only relevant jobs she could find were administrative positions in doctors' offices and community health centers.

The pay was low, and "it was just a lot of paperwork," she says. "I didn't enjoy it."

Routsong decided to return to school to get her master's degree as a nurse practitioner. She looked into nursing programs at several community colleges. All had two- to three-year waiting lists. She entered an accelerated program at the University of San Diego, a private school, that will enable her to get a master's in three years. She's borrowed $65,000 and expects her loans to top $165,000 by the time she graduates.

Her student debt, she says, occupies a place in the recesses of her mind.

"I want to get married, and I want to have a family. What if I want to have a child and take time off while he's an infant? Will I be able to do that with all this debt that I need to make payments on?"

Law and medical students, who can usually expect lucrative careers, have traditionally borrowed to pay for their schooling. But more than 54% of education doctoral students — who generally don't expect high-paying jobs — also borrowed in 2004, according to the Project on Student Debt. These borrowers are primarily future teachers, principals and administrators. Their average loan balance: $43,029.

Long-term value?

One of the consequences of escalating loan balances is that today's graduates will spend a lot more time repaying their debts than earlier graduates did, Shireman says.

While a Stafford loan has a standard 10-year repayment period, borrowers with large balances can extend their payments for up to 30 years. There's a good chance, he says, that today's borrowers with above-average student-loan balances will still be repaying their loans by the time their own children start college.

Still, students remain willing to load up on loans in large part because studies have long shown that an investment in college pays off. The Census Bureau has estimated that college graduates will earn about $1 million more over their lifetimes than individuals with only a high school diploma.

The problem for borrowers with heavy debts is that the loan payments arise long before the higher salaries do, says Luke Swarthout of the Higher Education Project. Most graduates are expected to start repaying their loans soon after they leave school.

Besides earning modest starting salaries, they often have to shoulder the costs of moving to an expensive new city. &q
uot;The problem is, you don't get the $1 million when you graduate," Swarthout says.

"If you did, it would be a lot simpler."

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Google Might Abandon Google.cn,Really?

Really? Google co-founder Sergey Brin recently revealed that the company was likely to abandon its China-based search engine Google.cn.

On January 25 of this year, Google established Google.cn that operates on servers based in China, but now the users of Google.cn are not even up to 1% of people who use Google.com.

So the Chinese version of Google turns out to be merely a chicken-rib product to some extent, an Internet analyst asking not to be named told Chinese media.

When being inquired by domestic media over the market performance of Google.cn, its related marketing personnel declined to make comments on.

Google, which is also named Gu-Ge in Chinese for promotion, is the largest search engine in the world, but it has been lagging behind its Chinese indigenous rival Baidu in China market, with the latter presently taking over a half of the Chinese market.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Credit Reports is FREE!

With all the talk about the need to check your credit, to see if you’ve been the victim of identity theft, the other day I figured I’d take a look at my credit report. Reportedly, if you live in certain states, you’re entitled to a free credit check once a year.

I went to Equifax and put in my personal information securely and just like that I got my credit report, free of charge. I was a bit dissapointed though because I figured I’d see my credit score as well, but alas, only some data showed up. My report showed me who had been checking my credit lately, my open and closed credit cards, and any negative points on it. As it turns out, a lot of credit card companies have been checking my credit, I guess that’s why I receive so many junk credit card offers in the mail.

Overall, my report looked pretty empty, which was dissapointing. Had I paid to see my credit score, I might have been even more dissapointed. It’s not that I don’t have good credit, it’s that I have no credit. I only have one active credit card, and that one shows a balance of $0 every month - since I pay it all off immediately every month.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Suitors 'neck and neck' in battle to win BAA board's backing OH,WAAAAA

The bid battle for BAA was on a knife-edge last night as rival consortia led by Ferrovial and Goldman Sachs vied for a board recommendation, with competing offers pitched at around 950p per share.

In a day of high drama, the board of the airports operator convened regularly as the Ferrovial consortium raised last week's £9-a-share bid, only for its offer to be trumped by Goldman's team.

Ferrovial then returned with a bid of about 950p per share, valuing the owner of seven UK airports, including Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted, at £10.3bn. BAA also has £6.2bn of debts. This, too, was broadly matched by Goldman, whose consortium includes AIG, Canada's Borealis and Australia's Commonwealth bank.

The pair were said to be "neck and neck", with the offers within a whisker of each other on price and the BAA board focused on which was the more deliverable. In a short statement, BAA would only confirm it was "holding discussions with the Ferrovial consortium and is also currently in talks with another party". BAA shares closed up 23 at a high of 928p as traders said it was likely to fall into foreign hands.

Talks were expected to continue, with an announcement unlikely before this morning as the BAA board, led by chairman Marcus Agius and chief executive Mike Clasper, considered whether to recommend either offer.

While Mr Clasper has fiercely defended BAA's independence, there was a growing feeling in the City that he could not resist a 950p-a-share bid. One banker said: "The fact that BAA is talking to both of them suggests they are prepared to recommend at that level." The price is thought to include BAA's 15.25p dividend.

Last week, BAA rebuffed Ferrovial's £9-a-share bid, reiterating that "the intrinsic value of BAA is more than 940p per share". Ferrovial hit back, saying that accounting for BAA's convertible bonds cut that value by 28p per share, while exercising share options would take another 12p per share off any valuation.

Ferrovial also quibbled with BAA's argument that Budapest airport was already worth £300m - or 28p per share - more than the £1.3bn it paid for it last December. Ferrovial's consortium, which includes Canadian and Singaporean investors, said BAA shares traded at around 637p before it revealed its interest in February.

The long-running bid battle came to a head as Ferrovial reached day 46 in the timetable - the last point at which it could raise its bid. Goldman Sachs, which initially proposed a friendly deal at 870p per share, was last week given until Friday by the Takeover Panel to make any offer for BAA. However, the BAA board is understood to have asked Goldman to reveal its hand yesterday.

The bid battle has been complicated by the intervention of the Office of Fair Trading, which could lead to the break-up of BAA. In that scenario BAA's value is likely to increase.

Saturday, June 03, 2006

GOOD NEWS! Microsoft debuts security package

Most Users worried about staying safe online will soon be able to get software to protect their home PC direct from Microsoft.

The software giant's first security product goes on sale in the US from 1 June and will become available in other countries over the next 12 months.

The product, dubbed OneCare, rolls anti-virus, anti-spyware and firewall programs into one package.

OneCare costs $49.95 (£26.50) to protect three computers for a year.

Spam deluge

The OneCare package has been under development since mid-2003, and many Windows XP users have been testing early versions of it for Microsoft. The software is aimed at consumers and small businesses which currently have only the most basic protection against net-borne threats.

Microsoft said up to 70% of consumers either have no security software on their PC or have programs that are no longer updated.

As well as providing security programs, OneCare also includes back-up software that helps people recover important data in the event of problems. Those signed up to the service also get alerts about emerging threats and advice about what they need to do to counter them.

The software goes into shops and is available for download from 1 June.

Because Microsoft's Windows operating system is used on so many desktop PCs, it is by far the biggest target for net-based vandals and criminals.

Lax security on many home PCs, particularly those sitting on fast broadband links, has proved a bonanza for net criminals. Now it is estimated that 70% of junk e-mail or spam is routed via home computers hijacked through vulnerabilities in Windows.

The security failings of Windows has led to the creation of a huge industry that aims to make the operating system more secure. Microsoft's foray into security software pits it into competition with some companies such as Symantec, McAfee, Trend Micro and many others.

Both Symantec and McAfee are preparing all-in-one software packages that aim to do the same as OneCare.

Microsoft has said that, so far, it has no plans to build OneCare into its Windows XP operating system as it has with its net browser and media player. However it is likely that PC makers will offer the service as an extra when consumers buy a new machine.

The launch comes as security firms warn of the emergence of a trojan that poses as a security update from Microsoft - the latest in a long line of viruses that try this trick.